NRC Restores Public Access to Information

, director, Nuclear Safety Project | September 22, 2015, 6:00 am EDT
Bookmark and Share

Nuclear Energy Activist Toolkit #64

In July 2014, UCS learned that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had for nearly a decade been blanket withholding all documents it received from nuclear plant owners about fire protection and emergency planning.

In November 2014, I wrote the NRC Chairman on behalf of UCS, Beyond Nuclear, Greenpeace, Nuclear Information and Resource Service, and Enformable.com requesting that the Commission revisit this policy and revise it to restore the public’s access to non-sensitive information.

The blanket withholding policy had been adopted in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy as one of the measures intended to protect against the successful sabotage of U.S. nuclear power plants. The fire protection and emergency planning documents might contain information useful to potential saboteurs. The documents probably lacked such information, but the NRC opted to err on the side of caution.

Our group letter pointed that that during the intervening years, the NRC and the nuclear industry had made considerable progress identifying the kinds of information that should not be publicly available. Additionally, the NRC had established a process for plant owners to use when submitting documents to the NRC that contained this sensitive information.

We requested that the NRC discontinue the blanket withholding policy and instead rely on the common understanding the agency had reached with nuclear plant owners about sensitive information and the process developed by the NRC for handling such information.

The NRC staff revisited the issue, but did so from the wider perspective of information withholding practices in general. Whereas we had narrowly asked that the policy as applied to fire protection and emergency planning documents for operating nuclear power reactors be revised, the NRC staff reassessed its document withholding policies more broadly. Following this reassessment, the NRC staff in March 2015 asked its Commission for approval to restore public access to many documents but restrict access to documents containing sensitive information. The Commission voted unanimously in June 2015 to approve the NRC staff’s request.

Bottom Line

UCS appreciates the NRC granting our request and restoring public access to fire protection and emergency planning documents submitted to it by nuclear plant owners.

UCS is even more appreciative of the NRC reassessing its document withholding policies holistically and revising them globally. As a result, not only will the public regain access to fire protection and emergency planning documents, but also to appropriate documents spanning the NRC’s wide range of responsibilities.

The NRC’s decision continues to protect against radiological sabotage while restoring public access to many records. In late 2004 when the blanket withholding policy was adopted, “sensitive information” was like beauty in that it was subjectively in the eyes of the beholder. And even had “sensitive information” been objectively discernible to all parties, the NRC lacked a process for plant owners to use when submitting documents containing this information. With both of these issues long since resolved, the NRC can restore public access to the majority of documents lacking “sensitive information” while withholding from ne’er do wells the few documents containing “sensitive information.”

 

The UCS Nuclear Energy Activist Toolkit (NEAT) is a series of post intended to help citizens understand nuclear technology and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s processes for overseeing nuclear plant safety.

Posted in: Activist Toolkit, Nuclear Power Safety Tags: , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Patricia Borchmann

    Many thanks to Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) for taking leadership role, and working w/NRC staff, and relevant NRC sections to accomplish this major undertaking. Your ongoing work, and scientific perspectives are of great benefit to the public interest.

  • Got my fingers crossed that the UCS meddling does not allow Eco-terrorists to gain access to a nuclear power plant.

    • Greg N

      Well you may think the “Eco-terrorists” are the biggest worry here.

      As Fission Stories published here regularly show, the “bad actors” are already there in the plants – and have been for decades before 9/11.
      Thanks to greedy plant owners and lax safety oversight, both within the plants and by the NRC itself. They have been allowed to fester there, meanwhile hiding behind the cloak of “security” – national or otherwise to keep their activities secret.

      As experience has shown time and again – many of the “problems” you think will only occur don’t in fact occur – but only thanks to more public information being made available. To the events you fear will occur, are in fact only able to be prevented or mitigated by ensuring the public interest is being protected.

      • As Fission Stories published here regularly show, the “bad actors” are
        already there in the plants – and have been for decades before 9/11. Thanks to greedy plant owners …

        The idea that only operators of nuclear power plants are “greedy bad actors” as opposed to the operators of airliners, hydro dams, wind farms, biofuel refineries, car makers and every other industry is irrational to the point of absurdity. Think about it.

        To the events you fear will occur, are in fact only able to be prevented
        or mitigated by ensuring the public interest is being protected.

        Are you referring to fatal airline industry accidents which kill thousands annually, or one of the three nuclear powerplant incidents of note over the last half century that killed about a tenth of the number of Americans killed in cars every year?