Lochbaum Testimony on Waste Bill and Dry Casks

, co-director and senior scientist | August 7, 2013, 6:00 am EDT
Bookmark and Share

Dave Lochbaum testified last week to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee as part of a hearing on the Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2013 (S. 1240). The bill is intended to create a process for dealing with spent nuclear fuel in the U.S., which has been piling up at nuclear reactor sites since the government has failed to open a geologic repository to store it.

In particular, the bill would create a pilot interim waste storage site for high-level nuclear waste from a dozen closed nuclear power plants, a follow-on interim facility for waste from currently operating plants, and a new oversight agency to manage the process. The idea is to begin to move spent fuel away from reactor sites into interim storage on its way to an eventual repository.

But it will take many years or decades to site and build one or more interim storage facilities. In the meantime large quantities of nuclear waste will remain at nuclear plants. Three quarters of it is currently in cooling pools, many of which are overcrowded.

In his testimony, Lochbaum urged the committee to include a provision in the bill that would increase safety at reactors while the fuel is waiting to be moved, by accelerating the transfer of spent fuel stored in crowded cooling pools at reactor sites into dry casks. Currently the bill does not require such a step.

In addition to increasing safety and security, transferring spent fuel into dry casks is a necessary step to getting the fuel into a transportable form, so it makes sense to do it sooner rather than later.

 

Posted in: Nuclear Power Safety Tags: , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments


Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Richard Solomon

    Thanks for the summary of Mr. Lochbaum’s testimony.

    As I understand it, the spent fuel at Fukushima which was in dry casks survived the tsunami and is not contributing to the underground and ocean leaks of contaminated water that are going on. Given that it will take years to develop and implement any plans for a storage facility, dry casks are the most sensible thing to do at this point.

    Senator Feinstein is a member of that committee. I have written her to ask that she work with her colleagues to include measures to move spent nuclear fuel into dry casks. I hope other UCS members whose Senators are on that committee will do likewise. If/when a bill comes to the Senate for a vote, I hope members will advocate with their Senators for them to take a similar position.

  • Denis

    How about building a dry cask storage site at Hanford, close to the vitrification plant?
    It would make it easier to push for legislation allowing, or even mandating reprocessing.