Join
Search

Fission Stories #75: Letter of the Law

Bookmark and Share

In the early 1990s, the engineering department at the Susquehanna nuclear plant near Berwick, PA issued a procedure prohibiting the application of a certain coating to components and structures inside the Susquehanna reactor containment building. During a subsequent refueling outage, workers dismantled a component inside the reactor containment building, lugged it outside, and applied the subject coating. They then lugged the re-coated component back into the reactor containment building and reinstalled it.

They successfully satisfied the letter of the procedural requirement, but missed its spirit by a country mile.

The requirement was intended to prevent that coating material from being inside the reactor containment building. If an accident should occur, the conditions inside the reactor containment building could cause the coating material to generate large amounts of hydrogen gas. Fortunately, the misinterpretation was caught and corrected in time.

Our Takeaway

As with most things, written procedures are clearest in hindsight. It is challenging bordering on impossible to consider every possible interpretation when expressing a direction.

In cases like this one, a way to prevent this type of miscommunication would have been to include some reason for the prohibition within the procedure. The reason would have helped users of the procedure to better understand the context of the mandate so as to be able to follow both the letter of the law and the spirit behind it. But when doing so turns a 4-page procedure into a 90-page tome, that length imposes communication obstacles of its own.

Because communications can never be made invulnerable to misinterpretation, the backstop is like that used in this example. The mistake introduced by the miscommunication was caught and corrected before it caused serious consequences.

“Fission Stories” is a weekly feature by Dave Lochbaum. For more information on nuclear power safety, see the nuclear safety section of UCS’s website and our interactive map, the Nuclear Power Information Tracker.

Posted in: fission stories, Nuclear Power Safety Tags: ,

About the author: Mr. Lochbaum received a BS in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Tennessee in 1979 and worked as a nuclear engineer in nuclear power plants for 17 years. In 1992, he and a colleague identified a safety problem in a plant where they were working. When their concerns were ignored by the plant manager, the utility, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), they took the issue to Congress. The problem was eventually corrected at the original plant and at plants across the country. Lochbaum joined UCS in 1996 to work on nuclear power safety. He spent a year in 2009-10 working at the NRC Training Center in Tennessee. Areas of expertise: Nuclear power safety, nuclear technology and plant design, regulatory oversight, plant license renewal and decommissioning

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Comments are closed. Comments are automatically closed after two weeks.