Join
Search

Space Debris: Controlling the Growth

Bookmark and Share

I have a guest post on the Scientific American website that looks at the historical trends and recent events in the growth of space debris.

The end of the post talks about the enormous quantity of debris that would result from the breakup of a large satellite—the kind of thing that could result from an anti-satellite attack on a large spy satellite. It notes that destruction of a single 10-ton satellite could double or triple the amount of large debris (greater than 1 centimeter) in low Earth orbit. Such an event could therefore swamp all the efforts being made to mitigate debris production.

Here are the numbers that statement is based on:

NASA’s Standard Breakup Model is the best model around for estimating the number and size distribution of debris from a satellite breakup, and is based on past observed breakups. It gives 263,000 as the number of debris particles larger than 1 cm that would result from the complete fragmentation of a 10-ton satellite.

The breakup of the Fengyun 3C satellite due to China’s anti-satellite test, however, produced more than three times the amount of debris estimated by the NASA model. So I use a similar factor of three to get an upper bound on the amount of debris in the case of a 10-ton satellite. The table below gives these numbers.

For an introduction to space debris (from 2007) click here.

Posted in: Space and Satellites, Space Security Tags: , , ,

About the author: Dr. Wright received his PhD in physics from Cornell University in 1983, and worked for five years as a research physicist. He was an SSRC-MacArthur Foundation Fellow in International Peace and Security in the Center for Science and International Affairs in the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, and a Senior Analyst at the Federation of American Scientists. He is a Fellow of the American Physics Society (APS) and a recipient of APS Joseph A. Burton Forum Award in 2001. He has been at UCS since 1992. Areas of expertise: Space weapons and security, ballistic missile proliferation, ballistic missile defense, U.S. nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons policy

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Comments are closed. Comments are automatically closed after two weeks.