Nuclear Regulatory Crusader

, former director, Nuclear Safety Project | January 23, 2017, 6:00 am EDT
Bookmark and Share

To many, the acronym NRC stands for Nuclear Regulatory Commission. At times, NRC has been said to stand for Nobody Really Cares, Nuclear Rubberstamp Committee, and Nielsen Ratings Commission.

In regard to Larry Criscione, it may stand for Nuclear Regulatory Crusader.


(Source: NRC)

Larry is an engineer working for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Last year, Larry received the Joe A. Callaway Award for Civic Courage from The Safeek Nader Trust. Joe Callaway established the award in 1990 to recognize individuals who, with integrity and at some personal risk, take a public stance to advance truth and justice.

In March 2011, the three operating reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan melted down after a tsunami generated by a large earthquake flooded the site and disabled primary and backup power supplies to emergency equipment. In public, the NRC denied that reactors operating in the U.S. were vulnerable to such hazards.

In private, the NRC knew otherwise.

Flooding Risk at Oconee

In June 2010—nine months before Fukushima—the NRC issued a Confirmatory Action Letter to the owner of the Oconee nuclear plant in South Carolina requiring more than a dozen measures be taken. The measures were intended to lessen the chances that the Jocassee Dam fails and to increase the chances that the three operating reactors at Oconee survive should the dam fail anyway.

An evaluation showed that if the dam—located about 21 miles upriver from Oconee—failed, the site would be inundated with about 12.5 to 16.8 feet of flood water. The site was protected by a flood wall about seven feet tall, so it mattered little whether the actual depth was 12.5, 13, 14, 15, or 16.8 feet.

The NRC estimated that if the dam failed and flooded the site, there was a 100 percent chance that all three reactors would meltdown.

But the NRC issued the Confirmatory Action Letter secretly and did not tell the public about the hazard it required Oconee’s owner to lessen. After Fukushima tragically demonstrated the hazard posed by flooding, the NRC continued to cover-up measures taken and planned to lessen the flooding vulnerability at Oconee.

Larry and the OIG

So, Larry sent a 19-page letter dated September 18, 2002, to the NRC Chairman chronicling this history and asking four things:

  1. The NRC’s Office of General Counsel (OGC) should review the documents related to flooding at Oconee and the associated federal regulations to determine whether the documents could be made publicly available.
  1. The NRC’s Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR) should review the information on flooding hazards redacted from documents released to the public in response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to determine whether additional information could be made publicly available.
  1. Based on the OGC and NSIR reviews, ensure that all flooding hazard documents that can be made publicly available are publicly available.
  1. The NRC’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) should investigate whether the agency has been inappropriately marking documents as containing “Security-Related Information.”

Exercising his rights under the Lloyd-La Follette Act of 1912, Larry copied U.S. Congressional staff members on the email transmitting his letter to the NRC Chairman.

Larry’s letter was obtained by a reporter and featured in a Huffington Post article dated October 19, 2012.

As Larry had requested, the NRC’s OIG investigated handling of documents about flooding hazards. But rather than investigate whether NRC had improperly withheld information as he contended, OIG investigated whether Larry had improperly released information. As detailed in our 2015 report on the NRC and nuclear power safety, OIG made Larry an offer—he could voluntarily resign from the NRC or they would turn over his case to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for prosecution.

Larry did not resign.

OIG did refer the case to DOJ.

DOJ did not prosecute.

Through FOIA, UCS obtained DOJ’s response to NRC declining to prosecute Criscione. Under the Primary Reasons for Declination section, DOJ checked one box—No Federal Offense Committed.

Fortunately for Larry, not breaking the law is not yet against the law.

Thanks to Larry’s selfless efforts, the flooding hazards at Oconee have been made public. Larry had been right about the NRC inappropriately withholding information from the public. When lawyers and investigators were all through, the information he sought to have publicly released was publicly released. The NRC lacked legal grounds to continue hiding it.

More importantly, NRC’s mangers may think twice—or at least once—before withholding dam safety information in the future.

Unfortunately for Larry, he experienced unnecessary stress and expense defending himself against baseless OIG investigations. The Callaway Award does not fully offset those unfortunate consequences. But it helps show Larry and others who have our backs that not everyone wants to twist a dagger in their backs.

A video of the award presentation and Larry’s acceptance speech has been posted to YouTube.

Bottom Line

Doing the right thing when it’s relatively easy fails to accurately measure courage.

Larry Criscione did the right thing when it was a very hard thing to do. He could have remained silent like so many of his co-workers opted to do. He faced a strenuous courage test and aced it.

Posted in: Nuclear Power Safety Tags: , , , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • William Corcoran

    An inescapable fact is that persons and other entities engaged in wrongdoing covering up are provided with the basis for perceiving that they will benefit from impeding, deterring, harassing, intimidating, and otherwise mistreating whistleblowers.

    Observation: Only rarely is a private individual punished for impeding, deterring, harassing, intimidating, and otherwise mistreating whistleblowers.

    Observation: Even when organizations are punished for impeding, deterring, and mistreating whistleblowers the reports of the punishment usually include enough information for potential whistleblowers to conclude that the actual whistleblowers went through severe ordeals on the path to justice.

    Observation: For years nuclear industry executives used the following quotation to creating a chilling effect on its critics and to justify disrespecting them.

    “It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.― Theodore Roosevelt

    Observation: Even the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which deals with wrongdoing to whistleblowers, admits to not pursuing the wrongdoers , but rather just “helping the whistleblowers.”

    Observation: The case of Tyler Shultz, a Theranos whistleblower, is an example of how a well-connected concerned individual can be treated for stepping out of line and reporting concerns, at first through channels .

    Quotation: “Fraud is not a trade secret.”-Tyler Shultz, a Theranos whistleblower

    Lesson to be Learned (LTBL): Blowing the whistle is often a life-altering and/or career-limiting event.

    Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Investigation Practice (RAGAGIP): Find out who knew what, when they knew it, how they found it out, and what they did about it.

    Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Investigation Practice (RAGAGIP): When harmful conditions, behaviors, actions, and inactions were known earlier find out the causation of the reporting inactions.

  • William Corcoran

    An inescapable fact is that conditions, behaviors, actions, and inactions were what they were because those in authority wanted them that way, tolerated their being that way, or didn’t know that they were that way. This applies from the work location to the top governance and regulatory oversight.

    Observation: Situational awareness is a prerequisite for acting accountably.

    Quotation: “What is permitted is promoted.”- Unknown (for now)

    Observation: This has yet to be addressed for Fukushima.

    Observation: Unless the harmful behaviors and/or inactions of those in authority are corrected those behaviors and/or inactions are left to become involved in the causation of future harm.

    Quotation: “A fish rots from the head back.”-Old Russian proverb

    Observation: Leadership by example is a chilling effect when the leaders do not report the nonconformities that their subordinates know that they know about.

    Quotation: “…the people in a big system like NASA know what has to be done—without being told.” –Richard P. Feynman, Presidential Commission on Challenger

    Observation: “See no evil; hear no evil; speak no evil” appears to be a high level mantra protected at all costs.

    Quotation: “Quis custodiet ipsos custodies?” -Juvenal (Roman poet-2nd Century CE) A modern translation is “Who will oversee the overseers?”

  • William Corcoran

    OSHA gives anti-retaliation advice.

    What applies to the NRC?

  • kevin d blanch

    YOU MEAN THE N. UCLEAR R. ALLING C.HERLEADERS,, THEY ARE SCUMBAGS ON THE TAKE ALL OF THEM San Onofre they let them rob , meltdown scram and kill…. they are criminals with a lic. to let teh nuclear crime syndicate rob. lets have a meeting on the tax payer dime at the omni spa and resort,, i was there,,, 801-452-1908 of do i have a tell to tail,, when i am done with the nuclear energy crime syndicate they will all be in jail, including the N.R.C.