Trajectory of Satellite Launch vs. ICBM Launch

, former co-director | April 9, 2012, 8:02 pm EST
Bookmark and Share

Figure 1.

A number of people have asked whether it’s possible to tell from the path the rocket follows whether the North Korean launch is intended to place a satellite into orbit or is really a long-range missile launch. It is possible to differentiate, since both the shape of the trajectory and the burntime of the rocket would differ for a satellite launcher and a missile.

Figure 1 compares the early part of the trajectory of a typical liquid-fueled ballistic missile with a range of 12,000 km (red) and the likely Unha-3 satellite launch trajectory (blue). The satellite launcher flies on a steeper trajectory early on to get the satellite to a high altitude and then onto a horizontal path that will put it into orbit. The rocket engines for a satellite launcher also typically burn for much longer than those for an ICBM. In this example, the ICBM burns for 300 seconds and the Unha-3 burns for 590 seconds. The ICBM gets up to high speed much faster.

Figure 2 shows a blowup of the early part of those trajectories.

                                                         Figure 2.

Previous post on North Korea. Next post.

Posted in: Missiles and Missile Defense Tags: , ,

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.