Trump Opens Door to Renegotiating Controversial Okinawa Base Deal

, China project manager and senior analyst | June 27, 2019, 10:40 am EST
Bookmark and Share

The Okinawa dugong will be evicted from its island home if the deal on a new military base struck by President Obama proceeds as planned. President Trump suggested he wants to renegotiate it.

Bloomberg News reported that President Trump “regards Japan’s repeated efforts to move a large military base in Okinawa as sort of a land grab and has raised the idea of seeking financial compensation.” The New York real estate mogul said the land the United States military is vacating “could be worth about $10 billion.” He feels it belongs to the United States. It doesn’t.

But that’s exactly how the US military feels about its bases in Okinawa. These sentiments are rooted in the brutal battle to take the island at the end of World War II that cost 12,520 American lives. The US military wanted to keep it indefinitely. Japanese public protests led the government in Tokyo to negotiate the return of Okinawa to Japan in 1972.

The base Trump was talking about is in the heart of a densely populated urban area and continuing to operate it is dangerous for US military personnel and the people living near by. But Obama’s Department of Defense would only agree to close the facility if it got a new one in return. The Japanese national government agreed to build a new base in Okinawa’s Henoko village and pay the construction costs. The land under the old facility would be given back to the people who owned it before the US military appropriated the land in 1945 to build the base.

Outsiders might think the people of Okinawa would be happy. They aren’t. If you lived on the island you might see things their way.  The US military occupies about 18% of the land on the islands that make up Okinawa prefecture.  The land mass of Okinawa is only 0.6% of Japan’s total but it accounts for 74% of all the land occupied by US military bases in Japan. Just over half of all US military personnel in Japan are stationed in Okinawa, which bears a disproportionally heavy share of the cost of the US military presence in Japan.

Trump knows real estate. He’s right when he says the land occupied by the military base would be far more valuable in private hands, where it could be used to develop Okinawa’s economy, which is the poorest, by far, of any region of Japan. Military base-related revenue is a paltry 4.9% of the island’s gross income and provides only 1.4% of the island’s jobs.

Okinawans want the dangerous old base in the middle of the city closed and the land returned. They’d be happy to do the same with all the military bases on the island. The inconveniences of living on a tiny island with an enormous military footprint are too numerous to mention but there is one that deserves particular attention. Generations of Okinawan children have grown up hearing and learning impaired from the constant and literally deafening roar of the military aircraft that take off and land at those bases. The horrible sound of it all also depresses tourism—the mainstay of Okinawa’s economy—on what would otherwise be a tropical paradise.

Okinawans are not only unhappy with Obama’s deal but they’re incredibly angry about the way they were treated. Nobody asked them what they thought should be done.  They don’t think it is fair that Okinawans should be forced to accept the construction of a new base on an island already packed with them.  And Obama could not have picked a worse place to build it. The construction of the new base will destroy one of the most beautiful and biodiverse areas of the island, which contains a precious coral reef that is home to a number of beloved and endangered species.

Obama’s team tried to sell the deal to the local population with the fiction they were just moving the old base from a bad spot to a better one. They didn’t buy it. In a recent referendum on the new construction more than 70% voted to stop it. The current governor, the former governor and a majority of the prefecture’ s elected officials have used every legal means at their disposal to try to stop that base from being built. Elderly villagers laid their bodies down in front of enormous earth moving vehicles to slow the construction down.

One hope for the people of Okinawa is for the US Congress to acknowledge their basic human right to have a say in the matter and pull the plug.  Another is for President Trump to sit down with Okinawa’s Governor Denny Tamaki and cut his own deal.  Tamaki may be open to considering the financial compensation Trump wants in exchange for stopping the construction of a new base more than 70% of his constituents don’t want.

Posted in: Japan

Support from UCS members make work like this possible. Will you join us? Help UCS advance independent science for a healthy environment and a safer world.

Show Comments

Comment Policy

UCS welcomes comments that foster civil conversation and debate. To help maintain a healthy, respectful discussion, please focus comments on the issues, topics, and facts at hand, and refrain from personal attacks. Posts that are commercial, self-promotional, obscene, rude, or disruptive will be removed.

Please note that comments are open for two weeks following each blog post. UCS respects your privacy and will not display, lend, or sell your email address for any reason.

  • Okinawa Paul

    A few inaccuracies in this article. However, they don’t really affect the gist of the arguments against Henoko.
    1. Henoko isn’t a Prefecture. It’s a village.
    2. There is no evidence noise from military aircraft is affecting tourism. Conversely, tourism in Okinawa is booming at an alarming rate. Most overseas tourists are from Taiwan and China who come here on shopping holidays to buy brand products at drugstores. There are currently 44 or 45 huge resort hotels under construction in Okinawa Prefecture.
    3. “Elderly villagers laid their bodies down in front of enormous earth moving vehicles…”. Actually, most of these elderly protestors come from all over Japan. They’re not local villagers as such.
    Hope this helps improve the accuracy of an otherwise well-written article.

    • Gregory Kulacki

      Thanks so much for your comments! I fixed the first inaccuracy, which was an editing oversight. I’ve been to Okinawa a number of times over the last several years and met with the prefectural government and the Nago city government. I’ve talked with both the late Governor Ota and Governor Tamaki. I’ve spoken to the Okinawa caucus in the Diet. I’ve stood with the demonstrators outside the base. The assessment on tourism is, of course, open to question and I’m not an expert in that area. I am just repeating what I’ve been told. And the elderly demonstrators I met outside the base were all local, though I don’t speak Japanese (yet) and was not introduced to many others.

      • miyanagi naomi

        Thanks for your understanding!
        Sure, Henoko is a name of a village, but this #HenokoMayonnaiseBaseScandal involves a huge life-threatening destruction of marine environment. Because these marine creatures saved the survived residents from starving at the end of war, we have special respect to the sea of Henoko and Oura bay.
        Such scandalous construction spends more than $23 billion of our tax & pension, to fertilize the ABE-phyl non-scientific contractors & consultants, maybe some of them exist in US.
        JP/US ignore election results and referendum which showed ”oppose to Henoko reclamation”, and forcibly progress the vicious construction now.
        It’s a Power-harassment and Abuse.
        Futenma return will bring back the railroad which people used before WWII, and Henoko abandon will bring back our money to buy US’s excellent goods.